![]() ![]() It requires interactions with the PC which I current can't do with my main stereo system where I evaluated the AS-61. I have a decent fixture for proper comparison of nearfield monitors. An ideal response would be a "hot" center and dropping to the sides. This seems to indicate diffraction (little speakers singing along). We see the highest amplitude as represented by darkest shade of red is spread around and mostly pushed towards the corners. This is looking into the speaker in front of you. Looking at predicted in-room response, we see the same chewy response: Single number sensitivity scores do not give you correct information. So don't go by online calculators to compute how loud a speaker gets. There, the sensitivity naturally drops like a rock to just 75 dB. However, in my analysis of my music library, the peaks are around 40 Hz. Overall, it seems to average around 84 dB. Since the graph is calibrated to 2.83 volts at 1 meter, the frequency response also becomes your sensitivity graph. Don't have an explanation for the final dip as we approach 20 kHz. Clickrepair erfahrungen drivers#The dip around 7 kHz seems to be typical of coaxial drivers and disappears off-axis. Maybe it is hard to better tune this with the internal woofer? Regardless, the room will obliterate this part of the response so what you get at the end of the day, is not this dip although we do want to start with flat response if we can. We have a dip at 200 Hz where the crossover is from the woofer to mid-range. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:įor whatever reason, I expected to see a much more flat response. Final database of measurements and data is 1.4 Gigabytes in size.Īcoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker can be used. Over 1000 points around the speaker were measured (from 20 to 20 kHz) which resulted in well under 1% error in identification of the sound field emanating from the speaker. All measurements are reference to tweeter axis with the grill removed. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than anechoic chamber. It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections. Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This downside is high complexity of the internal design. This design uses the filtering that the acoustic coupling provides to also cut out the harmonic distortions of the woofer. It then couples to the passive radiator that looks like a woofer. This is a 3-way speaker but the woofer is hidden inside with a port. But is a nice touch to make it less boxy. It does not store any personal data.Speaker has slanted sides which made it harder for me to align on my measurement rig. ![]() The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". ![]() These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. It is possible that ” wavelet x2” can be a good idea on some occasions. There are some choices for the repair method simple, wavelet, wavelet x2, wavelet x3. But it is not water proof, and sometimes it frees real clicks. I always use this this setting (except for very worn records). ![]() This setting lowers the risk for false repairs. I normally always use this setting.īrass instruments have a special sound profile. This lowers the risk for the program to wrongly repair for instance a cymbal. I start with 12 – 17, and depending on the record I stay at this level or I gradually increase up to 40 – 50 or fully automated. I chose a low value for instance 14 for a good record, and a higher value for a worn record. ”DeClick” – the sensitivity for ClickRepair to find a ”click”.Not designed for EP/LP so I haven’t tried. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |